What Would You Stand In Line For?

Disclaimer: This post is not a political post, just happens to stem from political gatherings. This post does not endorse any candidate, nor is the candidate necessarily a reflection of my political views.

Now that I have that out of the way...

The Background:

I was recently able to meet three presidential candidates over the last few months. Living in Iowa during an election year presents that type of opportunity, and I have enjoyed taking hold of the opportunities that have came up. First, Marco Rubio, then Ben Carson, and then the most recent one. The candidate: Donald Trump. The temperature outside waiting for Trump: Very Cold. Time spent waiting outside in the cold to (maybe) see Trump: Just shy of 2 hours. Total Trump time on a Saturday: 5 hours.

The Summarized Story:

Standing in line outside in the cold was not the most enjoyable experience, especially for my wife who did not quite dress well enough for the cold temperature. When doors open at 12:30 and we get there shortly after that, the line should be moving right along, right? Well 1 1/2 hours later we were still in the line, still outside, and still cold. The line was now being diverted to overflow seating to watch a live video feed in another building. This was a bummer, but we still were going to stick around and get educated. The day was about to include a bit of excitement, and to summarize, here is what happened....a staff person came up to us and 4 other people around us to lead us not to the overflow seating to watch the video feed, but instead to the building we originally were headed to. Evidently there were open seats left in the auditorium so we were going to get them. Needless to say, the seats ended up being in the very front row! One of those "right place at the right time" moments, and it was a great experience to be a part of. Trump had his speech, came to the front to shake hands, and even had time to scribble his autograph on a sign for us.

The After:

I can definitely say the rally was quite the experience. The excitement around Trump was easily felt, and it was great to see first-hand one of the top polling candidates. When we came back home, I had a feeling of excitement from the day and of uncertainty. I just met Donald Trump, sat in the front row, got his autograph, and my wife shook his hand! I also just spent nearly 2 hours standing outside in the cold, windy weather, and the last 5+ hours devoting my time to a candidate who I do not necessarily agree with.

Did I just waste my time?

I could have done numerous other things on a Saturday. There is always work to be done at school, always pages to read in books, things to do around the house, or projects to make. I really flip-flopped in my mind over the next several days, and even as I write this, if the time I spent that day was truly worth my time. I keep bringing up the same questions in my mind: "What things would I stand in line for for nearly 2 hours, just to have a possibility at seeing my intended goal?" "What does standing in line for Donald Trump for 2 hours show about who I am?" "Who or what else would I do the same thing for?"

The only other types of events I have stood in line for, to the best of my knowledge, for that amount of time would be a Minnesota Twins game, on a few occasions. I have never done any Black Friday shopping, nor have I waited in line to watch the release of any blockbuster movie that is having its opening night. So I guess the things I will wait in line for are the Minnesota Twins and Donald Trump.

Neither of those things are inherently bad things to stand in line for, but I think it is important to know the purpose of standing in line. I love referring many decisions back to the phrase of "form follows function." What functions was I trying to fulfill? In these two standing-in-line cases, I am enjoying a time with friends or my wife, and also trying to get educated on the presidential race. Therefore, my form was to go and experience something that would support those functions. I did not go to praise or idolize a baseball player or candidate. In those cases, standing in line would have been a waste of time.

I wonder what other things I will be standing in line for throughout my life for 2 hours. I highly doubt these two instances will be the only ones. When I do stand in line again, I hope I can have a reputable function for that form, so I do not waste the time freezing my fingers off for no good reason.

What would you stand in line for?

Conversations: What is your purpose?

There are two sides to every coin.

You can't have lemonade without lemon and water.

There's more than meets the eye.

Dig deeper.

However one may want to phrase it, it is reality that ideas should not be looked at from just one person's perspective, or just the surface level There is more to a story than one's own opinion. Humans were given the ability to think and reason, to live in community, and engage in dialogue. We grow by having conversations, we do not grow by forcing our ideas on others.

A teaching practice used to help students understand meanings of words is to have them give a non-example of the word. If a student can give an example of what the word is not, the student likely has a very good understanding of what the original word means. There is a bigger picture to the word when seen in a different light.

The same can be said with opinions, other people, and conversations that are had. Crucial Conversations points out some great skills when engaging in dialogue with other people, especially when topics may be sensitive. One of the skills promoted is to encourage testing:

The test of whether your motive is to win a debate or engage in real dialogue is the degree to which you encourage testing.

Seek to view the other side. It may confirm your original thinking even more, and not change your viewpoint. It might change your outlook and now could include both sides in some sort of a hybrid view, or it might shed light on a totally new perspective you. Whichever way it leads, there is growth. 

Below is a TED Talk highlighting the dangers of listening to a single story. Watch it, and reflect on other single stories that may be masking themselves as truth in your life.

The Danger of a Single Story 

Learning Environments: A Student's Avenue to Thrive or be Squelched

The topic of space within schools has been one on my mind quite a bit lately. The main reason being that our school is in the midst of a building project. We have had to get a little creative when it comes to using the space we have and been getting creative in terms of what it would look like if we added on to our existing building. Teachers have been providing input in regards to the set up of where rooms are placed and how space is used. A second reason is because of a webinar I watched recently led by Danish Kurani. Danish is an architect who seeks to create sustainable schools that are designed to prepare students well by providing learning spaces designed to meet the function of the task. Out of these two experiences stems a lot of different ideas as to how space should be used and who should get what. What it all boils down to though is the following:

How a classroom or school is physically set up tells a lot about how the teacher or school views the students.  

Are rooms in the shape of nice boxes with long, narrow hallways going to each room to keep students in a nice straight line when they go from room to room where they stay for the whole day or for a set period of time?  Within the rooms, are desks in a straight line, facing the whiteboard, so that students can clearly see the teacher up front?

https://www.flickr.com/photos/dcjohn/74907741

Or are desks arranged in groups, so students are sometimes facing each other and able to talk with one another?

https://mrtylerslessons.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/7-my-classroom-august-2013.jpg

Or are there tables in the room that students sit around, creating less of a mindset of "my spot"?

http://www.foursquarefurniture.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/school-hushboard1-725x484.jpg

Or, does your room model the one below, with many different learning areas available depending on what is needed for the task?

https://processofliving.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/21st-century-classroom-2.jpg

The adage "form follows function" is a key one when it comes to designing learning environments for students. What is the function of what you are trying to do as a teacher for your students? Are you trying to teach them how to sit straight and learn everything from your mouth? Or are you trying to have them collaborate and share with one another? Or are you needing to have some of both? 

A room does not, and most likely cannot be all the learning environments a student should have in order to be successful. A school should, however, strive to provide different areas throughout the school where different environments can be available to learn depending on the task. Is there an area where students can present to each other what they have learned? Is there a collaboration space? Is there a "big board" where brainstorming can happen? Are there places that look like places in the real world that students can interact with to allow life skills to start developing at a young age? Teachers are often too possessive of "their space" and are unwilling to give up the space they call home. Sharing spaces and physical resources does not happen as much as it probably should. If the focus is on the students, spaces should be a little more flexible and willing to change to fit the need. Student learning should not expect to happen at a high level in the same room and same set up every single day of the entire school year. 

Keep the focus on the students. What do they need to be successful and how can the environment be shaped in order to best allow that to happen?

Module 4 Reflection

DCSM4T Module 4 Reflection

4 weeks...just like that the class is over! It went by very quick, but not without a lot of good information and learning happening along the way. 

The biggest takeaway for me will be the use of Twitter. I had been on Twitter as one who took information from it, mostly following new stories or sports stories with a few education related people/organizations thrown in. All of these were mainly there for me to read up on if I felt a need to. After going through this course and learning about a PLN and finding the value in Twitterchats, I will be more of a producer on Twitter! There are so many people out there to connect with, and Twitter is a phenomenal resource to do just that, connect! I hope to continue my use of Twitter and continue to make valuable connections on it.

This blog is another tool I will commit to using. The blog provided a forced reflection :) Whenever I do sit down to think and reflect, I find it valuable, having a blog will provide more of an opportunity for that to happen and hopefully more growth results as well!

The digital footprint aspect of the course definitely made my use of social media change. I can control what I put on social media, so why not make sure there is a good footprint of me out there? With actions I can control, I need to make sure there is a good output with what I do share. Using Twitter well and posting relevant blogs will allow for a positive digital footprint.

The biggest challenge...time :) Life is full, but figuring out what priorities are will allow for the important things to get done and get done well.

Thanks #DCSM4T!

Rick Wormeli Summary/Response

The school I teach at recently attended a 1 day conference to listen to one of the current gurus in the field of education, Rick Wormeli. Rick is a phenomenal presenter and will keep viewers engaged throughout his whole day seminar though his quick wit, humor, references to movies/songs, dance moves, and his constant movement up front and in the crowd. This keeps those viewing watching intently and waiting to hear the next words to come out of his mouth. Oh, and it doesn't hurt that he is extremely passionate and about what he is talking about!

The following is a snapshot of some of a couple topics he talked about: Homework and Assessment.

Standards Based Grading

Homework

Homework is a time for students to practice the learned material. If students do not know how to do the homework, they should not have to do it because “practice makes permanent.” In addition, because it is a time for students to be practicing, homework should not be graded. Homework will will include multiple attempts and failures before it is learned well. This is one aspect I really like. I believe each students is unique and made in God's image, therefore they will not all learn at the same rate. We differentiate the content, product, and process, but why should we still think that all students will learn it at the same speed. Students are not all the same, so why should they be expected to learn it at the same rate?

Assessing

Wormeli’s overall purpose of assessing students is a way for teachers to provide communication to them about where they are in terms of where they are going. Rick stresses that schools should be assessing based on the standard the work is connected to. This way there is no false reporting of a grade, and it can be easily seen how well a student has learned a specific standard. Because of this, schools need to shift their focus to be criterion referenced, not norm-referenced. Basing a student on where he/she is at in comparison to other students does not necessarily show how well material is learned, instead it shows how well material was learned compared to how well everyone else learned it. By assessing based on a set criteria, the standards, all students are compared to a set standard and measured by it, not each other.

Averaging grades to calculate a final grade really does not make sense in Standards-Based Grading. If, again, we see that homework is used to practice and we do not expect every student to learn the concept at the exact same time (they are all unique, made in God’s image, and not 100% alike, correct) then why penalize them for not knowing it as well at the beginning of the year if now, towards the end, they do know it well?

  

Dordt College Social Media For Teachers: Module 3 Reflection

Connectivism 

For a nice overview of connectivism, watch this YouTube video.

For my first reactions to connectivism, read on. Know that they are my first reactions, and I am always learning about what it is and how it looks!

To me, the idea of connectivism makes a lot of sense. When I do not know the answer to something or a problem arises that I have not experienced before, I will immediately do a google search. Watching the video above showed some of the same experiences that I have when online. I will read an article, see comments, click on another link within the article, watch a video on that new site. Before I know it, I have gone to 4 different places to learn more information on a certain topic. It is something that comes natural to me when learning about something new. Connectivism, to me, seems like an individual way of constructivism. A person is interacting with ideas to learn more about it. It is self paced and self motivated.

Now...does that make it a learning theory? If a learning theory describes how information is learned or absorbed, then I would have to say yes, it is. So what would be better ways to make this connectivism learning theory work better? The person who is searching needs to be more conscious that it is a time where learning is going to happen. Don't just get connected to quick learn the answer and then jump out, devote the time you are using when connected to make it stick so that the next time you do not have to do the same thing again to learn it.

For educators, connectivism is a key aspect of ongoing learning. With all the information out there. Conscious steps need to be taken in order to connect with the right sources and people. The social media tool I looked at this week, Periscope, is an interesting one in light of connecting parents/community members with what is going on in school, but I am not so sure it is a great one for teachers to develop ongoing professional learning. Again, I would need to explore Periscope more as well to find out if this is true, but as far as information sharing and learning more about a specific topic, I do not see it as being a "go-to" to get connected.

DCSM4T: Module 2 Reflection: Google Update

I Googled myself.

Dave Mulder Googled himself and found some things that he did not necessarily expect to see and I had the same experience. I did not expect to have sports articles from my high school career, but I did enjoy the nostalgia of reading up on some the articles I was mentioned in from high school! Not that I am that old, but it is definitely a sign of how things are permanent and that there is sometimes no control over how my name gets online.

I also ran across a personal website I made for a class at Dordt. It was interesting what I found on there. There were a few things on it that did not necessarily help my digital footprint. I had a nice little bio of me, which is obviously now outdated. Someone who looked at it could possibly think that was current, and have a very different perspective of me than what is actually true. Also, there was a list of educational websites, one of which was now an invalid link. Invalid links on websites make me agitated because I don't understand why someone would put a link on there when there is nothing to go to. Here I was doing the same thing! It looks bad on me as an educator to have a list of educational links with one of them being invalid. A final page on the site had two documents attached to it: a resume and a classroom management plan. They were quite interesting reads I must say. Again, the resume, like the bio, was quite outdated and would not allow me to have much to stand on if it were to be used for any sort of application. The classroom management plan was ok, but definitely not what I would say is true for me currently. It was great to see what I thought back then, but it looked like that document, and whole page, was who I was currently.

I deleted the page.

This aspect of my digital footprint was something I had control over, so I decided it was one that I wanted to get rid of because it no longer accurately portrayed who I was. For an updated bio, my faculty page at school is now the only thing online that tells a little bit about who I am. This is a good thing, because before it looked as though I was currently doing undergrad work at Dordt, 20 years old, and no teaching experience!

Google search now has an updated version of who I am.